Feedback to radiology on the quality of NT and CRL measurements

Accurate nuchal translucency (NT) and crown rump length (CRL) ultrasound measurements are essential for high quality risk results for pregnant people who choose to participate in antenatal screening for Down syndrome and other conditions.

To support best practice, Health NZ | Te Whatu Ora provides information to radiology practices, radiologists and NT practitioners on the quality of NT and CRL measurements. This started with measurements performed during the January to December 2014 period. This feedback has been endorsed by the New Zealand branch of the Royal New Zealand and Australian College of Radiologists (RANZCR) and the New Zealand branch of Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM).  

Tools and resources

The Guidelines for nuchal translucency (NT) and crown rump length (CRL) measurements are to outline best practice technique, image review and external quality improvement requirements to ensure best practice scanning for this screening.

Read the Guidelines for nuchal translucency (NT) and crown rump length (CRL) (PDF,2MB)

The Quality improvements for Antenatal screening - What, Why, How presentations explains what the feedback means, why it is important and how it makes a difference to the risk result for antenatal screening for Down syndrome and other conditions that is provided to pregnant people.

See the Quality improvements for Antenatal screening - What, Why How presentations on the resources page

Read the information to interpret the graphical report provided to NT practitioners, radiologists and practices on NT and CRL measurements

View the video below for tips and techniques for optimising images for the NT scan.

Video transcript
My name is Carol Bagnall and I am a sonographer working in women's health.
0:09
This presentation gives guidance on how to optimise the nuchal translucency examination.
0:15
Quality improvements to antenatal screening were introduced in NZ in 2010 when maternal
0:21
serum was combined with the nuchal translucency (NT) and crown rump length (CRL) measurements.
0:29
Previously maternal age and then NT were used to screen for Down syndrome and other conditions.
0:36
A high quality 11–13 week scan and precise NT and CRL measurements are essential in providing
0:43
women with an optimum risk result for antenatal screening.
0:46
There is a tendency to under measure the nuchal translucency.
0:52
It important the NT and CRL are measured correctly, due to the amplification of errors that can
0:57
occur when they are not measured precisely.
1:01
This presentation provides guidance and a refresher on best practice and includes tips
1:06
for optimising both the image and the measurements.
1:09
Note that different equipment will require further tailoring of the examination.
1:16
As part of 12 week scan we should document the early fetal anatomy and placental location.
1:23
This presentation is only about optimising the NT and CRL measurements.
1:30
The results of the maternal serum test (known as the MSS1) rely on an accurate CRL measurement.
1:36
The CRL is used to standardise the biochemistry.
1:39
If the CRL is under measured it may increase the chance of a false negative screen rate
1:46
and if it is over measured it is more likely to increase the false positive screen rate.
1:53
To obtain a precise CRL you need to take a sagittal view of the fetus in a neutral position
1:59
horizontal on the screen.
2:02
Callipers are to be placed on the crown which is the skin above the parietal bone and the
2:07
rump, which is inferior to the tip of the sacrum.
2:11
For antenatal first trimester screening, or MSS1, the CRL should be between 45 and 84
2:19
mm.
2:20
You need to use appropriate depth and magnification.
2:24
Ideally the scan is done around 12–13 weeks when the CRL is 56 mm or greater.
2:33
The measured CRL axis should be at 90 degrees to the ultrasound beam, measuring at angles
2:39
greater than 30 degrees will likely lead to measurement error.
2:44
This slide demonstrates the fetus lying in a horizontal position in a sagittal view with
2:49
the callipers placed correctly at the crown and the rump of the fetus.
2:54
This slide show a fetus lying in the correct position with the callipers placed at 30 degrees,
2:59
which is acceptable.
3:01
However, it would be more ideal to have the callipers placed on the horizontal with respect
3:06
to the ultrasound beam.
3:08
This slide shows the fetus in correct sagittal position but where magnification has not been
3:12
used making it harder to correctly place the calipers.
3:18
The following three slides demonstrate how much variation in measurment can occur depending
3:23
on fetal position, thus stressing the importance of correct fetal position when measuring the
3:29
CRL.
3:30
This slide shows the fetus in the correct position where appropriate magnification has
3:35
been used so a reliable CRL can be obtained.
3:40
This is the same fetus but with a poorly obtained CRL demonstrating under measurement of the
3:45
CRL at 49.8 mm, which is a difference of 7.7 mm from the previous slide.
3:55
This slide shows the same fetus but where the angle of the fetus with respect to the
4:00
ultrasound beam is greater than 30 degrees.
4:03
The fetus is also not in a sagittal position.
4:07
This demonstrates an under measurement of the CRL at 53.2 mm which is a difference of
4:14
4.3 mm from the first slide.
4:18
To obtain a good quality NT measurement, the fetus needs to be in a midline sagittal position
4:24
using the intra cranial landmarks of the diencephalon, mid brain and 4th ventricle.
4:30
The maxilla should not be visible.
4:33
You should use the highest frequency transducer available; this may be a linear probe a curve
4:39
linear or a trans-vaginal probe.
4:42
You need adjust the depth and magnification so that you demonstrate only the head and
4:47
upper thorax in the field of view.
4:50
Adjust the gain settings.
4:52
Adjust the dynamic range and place the focus on the correct location.
4:57
You need to measure on the line to on the line that define the NT and measure the widest
5:03
part of the NT.
5:06
This slide shows NT measurement where appropriate magnification has been used.
5:11
The fetus lies in a midline sagittal position with the appropriate intra cranial landmarks
5:16
seen. You can see there is no maxilla present, the intra cranial translucency at the back
5:22
of the fourth ventricle is present and the amnion is visible at the back of the fetus.
5:28
To help guide you that the fetus is in the correct position, you should note that the
5:32
fetal palate should be between 30 and 60 degrees relative to the horizontal as shown in this
5:38
image.
5:40
The fetal head should not be too flexed onto the chin, the nasal tip should be level or
5:46
above the anterior abdominal wall relative to the horizontal and there should be a pocket
5:51
of fluid at least equivalent to the size of the palate visible between the fetal chin
5:56
and chest.
6:00
Shown here is how the same fetus can be imaged and differing NT measurements can be obtained.
6:06
The same frequency probe was used, but the fetus is in a slightly different position,
6:11
and the only other adjustment was the gain.
6:13
The high quality image is on the left, demonstrating an NT of 1.8 mm by adjusting the gain and
6:21
position you can see that the NT is 1.6 mm which has resulted in an under measurement
6:28
of 0.2mm.
6:31
Here we show the difference in NT obtained using different magnification settings.
6:37
This is the same image taken where in the left hand side of the screen the appropriate
6:41
magnification is used and the NT measured 1.8 mm.
6:45
In the right hand image magnification was not employed and the NT was 1.5 mm resulting
6:55
in a under measurement of 0.3 mm.
6:59
Using different frequency settings can change the NT measurement.
7:03
On the left hand side a curve linear high frequency probe was used and the NT was measured
7:08
at 1.8 mm.
7:10
In the right hand image a 1.5 MHz curved array linear probe was used and the NT was measured
7:17
at 1.4 mm an under measurement of 0.4 mm.
7:23
In this slide the top left image was taken using a high frequency 4–8 MHz curved array
7:30
probe and the NT is measured at 1.8 mm. In the right sided image using the C1–5 MHZ
7:40
lower frequency probe with poor magnification the NT is measured at 1.2 mm.
7:47
An under measurement of 0.6mm.
7:49
Note how the intracranial landmarks are not well defined and caliper placement is poor.
7:58
This next slide demonstrates how a Transvaginal Vaginal scan can help when the fetus is in
8:02
a difficult position.
8:03
The slide on the right shows that the fetus was in a difficult position and the NT was
8:09
unable to be obtained, the slide on the left is the same fetus using a TV scan where the
8:15
NT was obtained at 1.4 mm.
8:20
Operator and skill can affect the NT measurement obtained.
8:24
Junior staff, practitioners who perform NT less frequently and those needing to improve
8:29
the quality of their images should be provided with support and mentoring by practitioners
8:35
with the skill to obtain high quality images.
8:39
The image on the left demonstrates the NT obtained by someone who was less experienced
8:44
or requiring support in NT scanning.
8:46
The measurement taken here is 1 mm.
8:51
The image on the right is a high quality image of the same fetus obtained by a more skilled
8:56
practitioner, the measurement obtained is 1.8 mm, a 0.8 mm difference.
9:05
This is the same fetus, demonstrating the image on the left where the operator had not
9:09
taken a satisfactory CRL measurement and the CRL is over measured.
9:16
The image on the right the appropriate CRL is obtained and is measured at 62 mm.
9:22
There can be a degree of luck involved in trying to manoeuvre a fetus into the optimal
9:27
position for obtaining an accurate NT.
9:29
In the top left image a fetus is shown in a difficult position, the same fetus is shown
9:37
below this image and to the right where techniques have been used to manoeuvre the fetus.
9:42
Techniques employed are at the sonographer's discretion and depend on individual circumstances
9:47
on the day of examination and can include getting the woman to fill or empty her bladder,
9:54
rolling the woman from side to side, or delaying scanning by 30 minutes – 1 hour.
10:00
So, in conclusion, it is important to remember it is the little things that count in obtaining
10:06
a high quality nuchal translucency and crown rump length measurement.
10:11
To get the most reliable risk result for women we need to optimise the ultrasound image every
10:18
time; use high frequency transducers when possible; adjust settings: 1: gain, 2: magnification,
10:26
3: frequency, and 4: opt for TV scan when appropriate. We may need to delay scanning. Remember, if
10:34
you cannot get a good NT image then second trimester screening is available.

Invitation to provide feedback

Your thoughts and suggestions on the process and resources are most welcome.

Please contact us at antenatalnewbornscreening@tewhatuora.govt.nz if you have any questions or feedback.